The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the book is called nature wants us to be fat and by the time this podcast comes out it will already be on bookshelves and i think the book which is the follow-up to the fat switch really goes into a lot of the stuff that we talked about today it goes into this next level of insight around uh fructose metabolism uric acid uh byproduct of that and the sequelae of that and do you mention also the vasopressin link and stuff in there as well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.