We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I see so don't eat McDonald's because it's low in fiber not because it's high in sugar and fat yeah I guess you're right the high sugar high fat foods don't tend to be high in fiber so I was making an assumption there but it's really about trying to optimize for high fiber High polyphenol foods and so anything that doesn't have that is you know not feeding
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.