We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Eating a large fries from McDonalds- fried in canola and soybean oils - is essentially the equivalent of smoking a pack of cigarettes (25 cigs) in terms of acrolein (group 2A carcinogen) content and other harmful α,β unsaturated aldehydes.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
eating this is like smoking a pack of these a recent study found that the amount of toxic chemicals like acryline and alides in a large fry at McDonald's is equivalent to what you get from smoking 25 cigarettes
So, we change 100% of it every Wednesday morning. >> Otherwise, we kind of move it up as we use it throughout the day and then refill uh the following morning. So you're looking at probably probably 80% of the oil is new every day, but every Wednesday 100% of it is brand new. >> When you heat seed oils, you get major problems. So when you heat the oils here, you make acryine. Acrylene is also found in cigarette smoke. It's a known carcinogen. And the amounts found in a large French fry of acryine are equivalent to a whole pack of cigarettes.