Paul Saladino· MD
there are studies that compare introduction of animal protein and plant protein and they see they see that the animal protein is not inflammatory at all compared to plant protein
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are studies that compare introduction of animal protein and plant protein and they see they see that the animal protein is not inflammatory at all compared to plant protein
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think that what we're gonna try and lean on during this discussion is interventional studies we certainly have a number of great interventional studies with meat showing clear trends toward well showing clear evidence that it's not inflammatory not harmful
i think that it's actually not fair to say that short-term trials are not valuable we would see changes in these inflammatory markers in foods that are harmful for humans