The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
wow this is you know I've read papers on meth I mean glycine and and the whole you know balance of Sammy it's so confusing and I will read them and they're like oh I got it and then I'll forget it and then I'll read it again and I'll forget it and I honestly well I I don't know you know and you know Chris Master John is is talk a lot about glycine and I've read his stuff and I still am confused for meeting his stuff it still doesn't make sense
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the methionine glycine balance on paper it sounds like it you could have a point there with increasing intentionally the glycine intake