We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the kangaroo study is comparing wild kangaroo to Wagyu beef and what they're showing is that the Wagyu beef slightly elevated il-6 more than the than the kangaroo meat and if you actually look in detail the HS CRP is a negative so on the y-axis on this kangaroo study it's it's which lowers HS CRP more they sort of flipped it over everything on the y-axis is negative so the HS CRP went down with both Wagyu beef and kangaroo but James is not admitting to that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.