The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what if it's all based on the latitude where you actually are okay we talked about this a couple years ago yeah yeah that because being in costa rica i find myself wanting to eat things a little bit different than i did when i lived in seattle like tropical fruit maybe this is just my subjective experience maybe it's completely unscientific but i'm in a place with this much sun and warmth it just feels right to eat papaya and mango
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think a lot of it has to do with uh environments I mean you look at environments where people you can when you live on the equator you can you can just eat fruit you can live on fruit in the equator pretty much I mean compared to when you live like in an environment where you know you're cold like up in the Alps somewhere or something where there's no fruit there's barely any vegetables what are you going to eat