The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so there's downsides with with flexible dieting the downside is um I've got to account for it right and actually so we know the data on on on reporting for food is like hor people under report by like 50% and it's pretty consistent in the studies
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so there's downsides with with flexible dieting the downside is um I've got to count for it right and I actually so we know the data on on uh reporting for food is like or people under report by like 50 and it's pretty consistent in the studies