The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we have a lot of soil that's depleted we have a lot of soil that's been monocropped we have a lot of glyphosate in our in our food supply now and we're really only just beginning to understand how that's affecting us and so I think we have the blueprint now for how humans are supposed to eat some sort of ancestral paleo animal-based diet I think is reasonable for most humans right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.