The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in some ways when bodybuilders are doing it it's not really sustainable because they're really starving themselves down to a competition and the way that they're eating during that period of time is you know it's it's so catabolic um that that they're destroying their endocrine system along the way but it's short-lived and they're going to refeed when they're done
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.