Peter Attia· MD
for up until two days ago the FDA was basically calling it basically an added sugar so you weren't getting the quote-unquote credit for it so manufacturers weren't using it much because it showed up looking like sugar
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
for up until two days ago the FDA was basically calling it basically an added sugar so you weren't getting the quote-unquote credit for it so manufacturers weren't using it much because it showed up looking like sugar
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.