The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so I know that's not the most optimistic response but that's kind of my view is like that has to be the direction we go in uh as opposed to continuing to try to answer the what is the best diet question which obviously you're not trying to answer because you realize the futility of that as well as I do but I but I still think many people in the in the public view that as the question that's trying to be answered
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.