The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
There's also many chemicals in an apple in an orange that you or I couldn't pronounce and that if someone wrote out what the chemicals are uh we would say what is that scary sounding thing um and we also know that things that we think of as natural can be just as harmful right fox glove uh hemlock right Socrates killed by being forced to drink all natural hemlock it was all natural very harmful so poison drugs often come from natural things.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And we also know that things that we think of as natural can be just as harmful right fox glove uh hemlock right Socrates killed by being forced to drink all natural hemlock it was all natural very harmful so poison reasons.