The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so direct ketry is the most rigorous way and that is literally um you know kind of in a bomb cimeter right you're you're you're in a metabolic chamber and they are looking at um you know how much heat you're generating essentially and from that heat that you generate they're able to determine your total daily energy expenditure and then using an equation based on your oxygen consumption versus your CO2 production they can determine what from that is your BMR
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.