The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so if that's the case really outside of someone maybe with nafld you'd have a hard time making the case to not eat an orange yeah i think that natural fruits are fine including like fake fruits like grapes i call grapes fake
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so if that's the case really outside of someone maybe with Naf D you'd have a hard time making the case to not eat an orange