Peter Attia· MD
the effect of substances in the body depends on their molecular structure not their ancestry.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the effect of substances in the body depends on their molecular structure not their ancestry.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, whether you give me the molecule and it was locally grown or not locally grown, organic or not organic, ultrarocessed or not ultrarocessed, it's the molecules and their structure that matter. conditional upon the molecules and the structure. Doesn't matter where it came from.
Dr. Schwarz who's a food scientist um says something like there is a motto repeat after me the effect of substances in the body depends on their molecular structure not their ancestry.
So whether you give me the molecule and it was locally grown or not locally grown, organic or not organic, ultrarocessed or not ultrarocessed, it's the molecules and their structure that matter.