The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think that my position uh is that humans are probably or appear to be an animal leaning omnivore and i base that position on unique nutrients and animal foods availability of nutrients and animal foods and uh paleo anthropology our focus on animal foods originally which probably had very unique effects on the growth of the brain and made us sort of who we are as humans today as homo sapiens
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.