The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it seems very probable to me that in a lot of men today their androgenic alopecia could be accelerated and women their androgenic alopecia or dht hormonal related loss of hair is almost certainly accelerated by stress pervasive nutrient deficiencies and these things that are causing increases in this corresponding intelligent effluvium
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.