The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they say in post-menopausal women with relatively low total fat intake a greater saturated fat intake is associated with less progression of coronary atherosclerosis whereas carbohydrate intake predominantly and I'm editorializing here in the form of grains if you read the study was associated with a greater progression of coronary atherosclerosis
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they say in post-menopausal women with relatively low total fat intake a greater saturated fat intake is associated with less progression of coronary atherosclerosis whereas carbohydrate intake predominantly and I'm editorializing here in the form of grains if you read the study was associated with a greater progression of coronary atherosclerosis