The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they showed that at 1% linoleic which is the ancestral there was no effect on carcinogenesis and on acceleration you know in Schumer encrusted rats and they showed that two or three or four percent then you got an increase in cancers rate of growth and after three or four percent linoleic in the diet if you kept bringing it up to ten or twelve it didn't get worse
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.