The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
these days when we eat meat we usually muscle meat which is a very narrow sort of range of animal based nutrients one of the things when you eat nose to tail say when you're cooking the bones for example you cook them long enough to eat them you get a bunch and the skin for that matter to a bunch of collagen and you get calcium hydroxyapatite
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.