The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
at least in this study what they found was that the women who were eating more of traditional carbohydrates grains rice oats wheat those sorts of things had increased progression of cardiovascular disease again this is an observational study so we can't draw causative inference but in this study it's pretty hard to suggest that saturated fat were in any way shape or form worsen or there's certainly no association with worsening of cardiovascular disease
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.