The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there were famous studies done in the 1960s the Minnesota coronary study where they had two groups of people and they were they were Mental Health institution patients and they fed one of them burgers that were full of saturated fat and one of them burgers that were full of seed oils I think it was soybean oil and it was like 9 000 participants and Ansel Keys was one of the people doing this study
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.