We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
even when she's comparing things like she Compares orange juice to Pure glucose or to Coke it's non-comparable in many different ways besides the fact that the sugar content is the same so it's basically a fallacious straw man argument to say oh they're exactly the same
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
she doesn't even read the studies that she cites so she's like citing a bunch of studies for different things and then she's not reading what the outcomes are and what what's going on and she's making like clear errors
So, she's like citing a bunch of studies for different things and then she's not reading what the outcomes are and what what's going on. And she's making like clear errors. And even when she's comparing things like she compares orange juice to pure glucose or to Coke, it's non-comparable in many different ways.