The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the the the fat produced was not just being used as a caloric source but it was being used as a source for water because when fat is metabolized when it's oxidized it generates a ton of water yeah yeah it generates water so animals in the wild when they store fat they're actually storing it not just for calories but for water so the hibernating hibernating animals right yep well we'll use the fat as a source of water while they're hibernating
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.