We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
saturated fat was harmful for humans completely false this has not been shown definitively and there are many many observational epidemiology studies meta-analyses and even interventional studies now like the one i showed in animal models and even in humans showing that saturated fat is beneficial
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the evidence that saturated fat is harmful for humans is is is weak weak. I mean, >> weaker than that. >> It's it's extremely weak.