Paul Saladino· MD
the assumption in nutritional paradigms over the last 50 to 100 years has generally been that these plant molecules these terpenoids these plant defense molecules are good for us
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the assumption in nutritional paradigms over the last 50 to 100 years has generally been that these plant molecules these terpenoids these plant defense molecules are good for us
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think that my hypothesis what the idea that I would Advance is that plant defense chemicals are problematic for humans the more you minimize them the better you are