The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is a famous paper in 2012 from the world Journal of Gastroenterology that many people have heard me talk about in previous podcasts in which the removal of fiber causes the complete resolution of idiopathic constipation or constipation without a known cause in a moderately sized group of people
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
this is a famous one from 2012 in which they actually they actually removed fiber from the diet of people with idiopathic constipation and the constipation resolved completely