The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, this is a bit of a messy analysis to your point because we're including the MCE, we're including Sydney, but we're also including Rose Corn Oil. So, we're we're we're we're just trying to get as many bodies as possible through the through the engine of the meta analysis. Um, and we don't reach significance. In fact, the only study that reaches statistical significance is the Sydney heart study and that had a 74% increase with a confidence interval of 1.04 to 2.91.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.