The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
like shouldn't you spread the nourishment across i mean i don't think there's anything such as waste in nature anyways and you would have thrown the brains out bugs and everything else would have eaten it but if you're going to be the predator eating it just like the hodzo why wouldn't you extract as much nutrition out of that one kill as humanly possible and that's exactly what they do
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i mean we we ate every single part of the animal we ate the skin off of the baboon's face we the brains we like i mean it's just like interesting to see them do the same thing with every single animal that they got