Paul Saladino· MD
humans need fat to complement the protein and or carbohydrates which can be eaten in a very helpful way
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
humans need fat to complement the protein and or carbohydrates which can be eaten in a very helpful way
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
because humans cannot consume more than a certain amount like maybe 40 of their diet from protein so they need to complete it with either fat or carbohydrates and when there's no fat from large animals they are they're starting to be dependent on the plants for that