Paul Saladino· MD
yet another evolutionary suggestion or corroboration of the assertion that humans are built to be animal hunters and that animal foods lie at the center of our existence
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
yet another evolutionary suggestion or corroboration of the assertion that humans are built to be animal hunters and that animal foods lie at the center of our existence
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
according to analogy with present uh carnivores we consumed more or less 70 over 70 percent of our calories from animals and not i i don't know if there's 30 percent but that probably changed from one place to another depending on the season and ecology
you know we were hyper carnivores certainly um you know for the last 2.6 million years I would say at least 70 of the calories were likely for most of our ancestors were coming from animals