The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
even if someone were just to take let's say you took you as an expert and like a few other people as experts and you each got to just put your favorite foods like into a list you know what i mean and if people could only eat from that list they'd still be healthy as crap compared to what most people are eating because most people most people are struggling with the cravings and then eating the things they know they're they're not supposed to
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.