Peter Attia· MD
so for us I mean it's really like you cut two three maybe 4% of your body weight but you really don't want to go much more than that because with two hours you just don't have time
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so for us I mean it's really like you cut two three maybe 4% of your body weight but you really don't want to go much more than that because with two hours you just don't have time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if I was sitting at say 25 lbs 217 PBS then it gets to the point where a weight cut to 205 becomes a little bit untenable because uh where I compete at it's a 2-hour weighin so if you're cutting you know 10 15 PBS you're not going to be able to rehydrate and refuel quickly enough