Paul Saladino· MD
for James to claim as he does in the getting that a meta-analysis of a hundred fifty three studies on dairy and cancer is invalid because of industry funding is complete hyperbole
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
for James to claim as he does in the getting that a meta-analysis of a hundred fifty three studies on dairy and cancer is invalid because of industry funding is complete hyperbole
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.