The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
dr. Cordain did an analysis of there's 229 hunter-gatherer societies and Liz all the plat for the it's an N of 768 they have 317 different types of fruits that were identified which accounts for 41.3% of the total plant food
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
hunter-gatherer societies eat nuts is 9.6% and seeds is 7.2 and leaves 3.6 percent
so there's 229 hunter-gatherer societies and less all the plat fizzy so the it's an N of 700 viii they have 317 different types of fruits that were identified which accounts for 41 point 3 percent of the total plant food the hunter-gatherer societies eat nuts is nine point six percent and seeds is seven point two and leaves three point six percent