The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Triple extra credit: cut out the parts of plants that generally contain the most defense chemicals. These include leaves, stems, seeds (grains, legumes, nuts, and seeds), and roots. Congratulations! You now eat a carnivore-ish diet like your ancestors (and many currently living indigenous people) did/do.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
principle two is that i believe humans in general that all homo sapiens will benefit by considering plant foods on a toxicity spectrum
i believe that is why we can combine the least toxic plant foods these being not highly defended fruit which may contain some phytochemicals which have benefit in humans but avoid the more highly defended parts of plants the leaves the stems the roots these seeds seeds nuts grains and beans which are full of lectins
add to that the part of plants that plants want you to eat the fruit that have so much fewer plant toxins than vegetables leaves stems and seeds are highly defended a fruit is what plants want you to eat