We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the thing i say back is first of all that's false in most of these blue zones people eat a ton of meat the notion they're eating mostly plant foods is completely false just like the notion that the hodges are a plant-based culture which national geographic is printed it's completely false they're so meat-centric if korea is meat-centric so many of these cultures that are considered to be blue zones are actually meat-centric and the blue zones are cherry-picked
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so i don't know how if you guys believe that that blue zones substantiate the notion of plant-based diets that's absurd