The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are over 10,000 additives that the FDA lets just sneak into our food that have never been fully evaluated these are called the generally recognized as safe list of ingredients 10,000 plus of these ingredients in our food supply
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So in the 1950s when this law was created when this sort of backdoor loophole was created like you said it was mainly created with the idea of salt and wheat and like simple ingredients going on the 10,000 plus additives to food didn't exist then.