Paul Saladino· MD
Our predecessors have prized organs for millennia and we feed them to our dogs.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Our predecessors have prized organs for millennia and we feed them to our dogs.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i believe and this is one of the reasons or one of the hypotheses that i had going there that meat was really and by meat i mean meat and organs were really the central foods for humans for the last few million years of our life and we're the difference between us as bonobos and chimpanzees and us as australopithecines us as homo habilis homo erectus and eventually homo sapiens
our history our our lineage is is a people who became human by consuming large amounts of animal organs and meat
I think we're Homo sapiens and as Homo sapiens, meat and organs are a part of our just genetic book of life.
evolutionarily meat and organs have always been at the center of the human diet