We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
our understanding of nutrition and nutritional research and recommended daily analysis allowances and intake it's so it's either wrong or we don't even come close to scratching the surface for understanding what we should be eating and how nutrient depletion and repletion is all context specific dependent on carbohydrate intake and all of these other factors like activity levels sunlight exposure vitamin co factors
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.