The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
hunting made us human and i think that this is exactly what we're talking about here but you're you're sort of highlighting a point that i don't think i realized as well that the hunting gave us access to blood organs and fat you know we probably had access to meat before that as scavengers but it was blood organs and fat that really made us human and that really allowed us to become the the form of homo erectus and then homo sapiens that we understand uh to be today
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the difference between scavenging and hunting is the hunters have first access to the most nutrient-dense parts of the animal and that happens yeah and let's emphasize that's the blood the organs and the fat right that's period