Paul Saladino· MD
the best way to take non-fertile land like that soil we saw in the beginning of the podcast that has a low amount of carbon in it and to make it into rich soil is by putting animals on the land
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the best way to take non-fertile land like that soil we saw in the beginning of the podcast that has a low amount of carbon in it and to make it into rich soil is by putting animals on the land
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.