The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
uh but yeah so breakfast today I had a smoothie with fruit and a bit of maple syrup in it and I had hash that was some potatoes and uh it was actually chicken breast although we have local very well pastured chicken here that's actually fully pastured and uh and a couple of eggs on top of that and then I had coffee with about a cup of of local A2 milk in it and some sugar so that was uh that was breakfast
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.