The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
even grain-fed animals are spend 85 percent of their life on the pasture but the last 15 of their life before they are killed they're probably going through some traumatic things and like you're saying there's a question of whether we want to support that and whether that some of that can be internalized into what we are as humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if there's trauma in this animal and this animal literally becomes a part of me i eat it my body breaks down the constituent amino acids you know puts it back into different places in my body then that trauma is literally literally becoming a part of my body and i don't want anything to do with that anymore