The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they will share data that they will create large coalitions of researchers who would all share their data they would standardize their data they will standardize the analysis they would perform analysis in a very specific way and they would also sometimes actually i think this is becoming the norm have two or three analyst teams analyze the same data and make sure that they get the same results
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.