The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you had higher starting levels of acromania that was associated with all the metrics of um responding better to the diet in terms of BMI hypt waste ratio um you know A1C weight all of these things those people did better and it's correlative but they if they had higher starting amounts they responded better to the diets
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you start out with higher levels of acromania you know not to keep going back to this strain but it really is like this Keystone strain for a reason this study you know what they showed was that if you had higher starting levels of acromania that was associated with all the metrics of um responding better to the diet in terms of BMI hypto waste ratio um you know A1C weight all of these things those people did better and it's correlative but they if they had higher starting amounts they responded better to the diets