The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
zero yeah no we had a lecture which was by Dr Christopher Gardner who you may know yes I'm familiar with him's a big plant-based Advocate and but but but a dedicated researcher and we had basically like a little seminar on like a Wednesday where he talked to us about a paper about how garlic extract was not shown to impact uh heart disease outcomes and that was the nutrition uh research that I got in medical school
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.