The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and in people age 50 to 65 there was a relationship between protein intake and igf higher protein intake was associated with higher igf now it wasn't a huge difference this gets over stated constantly but it was statistically significant
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but what often gets ignored is the people over 65 there was no statistical difference whatsoever between protein intake and igf-1