The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think it's fit for purpose if you say to me tell me how many what proportion of that country has obesity bmi is probably perfectly reasonable um if you say i just want to know on average what's the approximate correlation between obesity level and whether you play golf or not that's probably okay but if you want to say i want to help this individual patient as pes especially at the sort of you know the the kind of artisan level that you go at then you need the better tools
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.